Could you please consider swapping the dimension order in which data is displayed for 2D / 3D Arrays? Tried to get used to it .. but it still trips me up
The way you present it now with the images it seems obvious it should be the other way around, but I remember the ordering felt intuitive for me when I initially did it. Perhaps a setting or at captions that show which dimension belongs a particular axis.
VilleK wrote:The way you present it now with the images it seems obvious it should be the other way around, but I remember the ordering felt intuitive for me when I initially did it.
Guess it depends what you're using the array for. When it comes to spatial data, the current layout doesn't feel intuitive ( to me ). A switch / setting to toggle between the modes might be best. Or I should just stick to reading / writing arrays in the "Value = Array[Z,Y,X];" format
Just to clarify .. on the left are the current layouts for 1D / 2D / 3D arrays, and on the right is what I personally prefer for spatial data.
I don't normally use persistent array values so I don't know much about the copy and paste functionality. I am working on a project where I would like to use a persistent 2D array- but I was wondering if it is possible to paste a set of values to to each row, instead of all at once. The reason is because it is a fairly large 2D array (nx256) that would eventually be a bit hard to generate, copy, paste all values at once.